Tag Archives: Cassette

There Goes Another Cassette

I wrote about chain and cassette wear in September 2013. You can read that post here: Chain Checkers Do No Good Just Sitting in Your Toolbox.

That post came after I had to replace a worn cassette on my Alchemy Eros. I replaced another worn cassette about four years ago and had to replace another this week.

Photograph courtesy of alchemybikes.com

As with the previous replacements, the need to replace this cassette came after installing a new chain. Chains with just 1% of wear should be replaced. My chain was well beyond 1% of wear. Anything more than 1% chain wear and the cassette is probably already damaged.

Chain wear is often called chain stretch, but this is a misnomer.  The side plates of a chain do not deform under pedalling forces.  Rather, it is wear to the pins, bushes and rollers that causes the distance between the pins to increase, thus giving the illusion of stretch.

This diagram shows A. pin/bushing wear and C. bushing/roller wear.  B shows an unworn chain. In short, chain wear is indicated by increasing spacing between pins. Note that roller wear does not affect pin spacing.

Illustration courtesy of pardo.net at http://pardo.net/bike/pic/fail-004/000.html

The guys at my LBS told me I would probably need to change the cassette. That need was confirmed during my short ride home when the chain started skipping over the teeth of my most-used sprockets. The rollers of the new chain were not meshing with the worn teeth on those sprockets.

The photographs below show a new cassette on the left and a worn cassette on the right. Both cassettes are SRAM Red OG-1090s.

Photographs courtesy of theprocloset.com (left) and blogspot.com (right)

The two teeth in the green circles labelled A show a normal tooth profile. The red circles labelled A on the right show a phenomenon called “Shark Finning,” where the leading edge of a cog tooth curves inwards, making it resemble a shark’s dorsal fin. In time, this erodes the top of the tooth and causes the chain to skip.

As mentioned above, wear to the pins, bushes and rollers causes the distance between the pins to increase. As the gap between the pins, bushes and rollers widens, the ongoing wear widens the space between teeth. You can see that the gap between the teeth, shown by the red arrow labelled B, is wider than the equivalent gap, shown by the green arrow B. The narrower gap between the pins, bushes and rollers on a new chain means that the new chain rides up the sides of each tooth. The chain has less grip on the teeth and skips.

The third sign of wear is the leading edge of teeth that are mushrooming out a little. That’s from the metal being rubbed down and compressed by the chain. Think of it like a roll of cookie dough. If you slap it down on the table, the bottom will spread out, but the top will remain intact. The metal of the cassette acts the same way.

I didn’t need to see these signs of wear to know I had to replace the cassette. The skipping on the two sprockets I used the most was all the evidence I needed to spend money.  

The strain on the wallet didn’t end there.  The LBS guys told me I also had to replace the chainrings. I should have seen that coming. The combination of putting almost 60,000 km on them with a succession of chains in varying states of wear would lead to eroded teeth.

The challenge was to find replacement parts. My 2015 Eros has a SRAM 11-speed groupset. Groupsets today have 12 or 13 speeds. SRAM 11-speed 11-32 tooth cassettes are getting harder to find. My LBS didn’t have SRAM 11-speed 52-tooth outer and 34-inner chainrings in stock either. Fortunately, I have a son living in Australia. I put him on the case, and he got all three parts for me.

Photographs courtesy of SRAM (chainrings), evobikes.co.za (cassette) and excelsports.com (chain)

The general rule of thumb is that a chain needs replacing after 3,200 km to 4,800 km. A cassette needs replacing after three chain replacements, i.e. after 9,600 km to 14,400 km. There is less of a consensus about chainring lifespan. 60,000 km seems a reasonable expectation.

I will pay more attention to chain wear than I have in the past 😄. In the meantime, I will enjoy the silent running of my brand-new drivetrain.

Chain Checkers Do No Good Just Sitting in Your Toolbox

I have not been regularly checking my bicycle chains for wear.  I have no excuse for not doing so.  I have the necessary tool for the job.  Two of them in fact.

Chain Checker

The purist will argue that a steel ruler or steel tape measure is the most accurate tool for measuring chain wear.  Using a ruler can however be error-prone because it is necessary to hold the ruler precisely and measure one end while making sure the other does not slip.  So tools like these ones have been created.  They are not as accurate as a properly-used ruler, but they are an easier and faster way to measure chain wear.

Chain wear is often referred to as chain stretch, but this is a misnomer.  The side plates of a chain do not deform under pedalling forces.  Rather it is wear to the pins, bushes and rollers that causes the distance between the pins to increase, thus giving the illusion of stretch.

This diagram shows A. pin/bushing wear, and C. bushing/roller wear.  B shows an unworn chain.  Note that roller wear does not affect pin spacing.

Illustration courtesy of par do.net at http://pardo.net/bike/pic/fail-004/000.html

Illustration courtesy of pardo.net at http://pardo.net/bike/pic/fail-004/000.html

In short, chain wear is indicated by an increase is the spacing between pins.  When I finally put my BBB chain checker to use it showed that the chain on  my titanium Alchemy bike had reached the point where it needed to be replaced.  What I didn’t know was when the chain had reached that point.  Had I been riding for too long on a worn chain, and perhaps damaged the drive train in the process?

Some of my Racun Cycling Gang had recommended Meng Thai Bicycle Centre for bike parts and service.  So I took the bike there to have a new chain installed.  Labor costs are still relatively low here as compared to the Netherlands, so I had less incentive to do it myself.  When I say low I mean a labor charge of  RM 30 / USD 9 to have a new chain installed and to get the bike serviced and tuned up.

My first ride with the new chain was up to Genting Sempah.  It quickly became obvious that I had waited too long to replace the chain.  The chain was skipping on one cog.  It didn’t matter which chain ring I was in.  The chain skipped on that one cog.

At first I couldn’t tell from looking at the cassette that there was anything wrong with it.

IMG_1663

A closer look revealed where the problem lay.

Cassette Wear

That shark-tooth profile on the fourth cog is not normal.,  The new chain rides too high up the ramp of the tooth and slips off.  The only solution was a new cassette.  I went with a SRAM PG 1070 cassette at RM 250 / USD 76 rather than replacing this SRAM OG 1090 cassette at RM 650 / USD 198.

The moral of this tale is to regularly check your chain for wear.  I now know, thanks to the late and great Sheldon Brown, that a chain that has just 1% of wear should be replaced.  Anything more than 1% chain wear and the sprockets are probably already damaged.

What is 1% of chain wear?  Ten links of a new chain are 25.4 cm long, measured from pin to pin.  If the last pin in link ten is just past 25.5 cm the chain needs to be replaced.  If the last pin is approaching 25.7 cm away then the most-used sprockets are already damaged.

I got 10,000 km / 6,214 mi out of the cassette.  I wonder how many more kilometers it would have lasted if I had replaced the chain as soon as it showed 1% wear.

I replaced the chain on the steel Alchemy a few days ago.  The cassette on that bike has 13,300 km / 8,265 mi on it so far.  Including 115 km / 71.5 mi with the new chain.

I caught that one in time.  No skips.